THE FACTS:
Title: The Disreputable History of Frankie Landau-Banks
Author: E. Lockhart
Publication Date: 2008
Pages: 352
Round of applause: Printz Honor Book, Finalist for the National Book Award for Young People’s Literature, Cybils Award for best young adult novel.
SUMMARY:
During the summer after her freshman year of high school, fifteen-year-old Frankie Ladau-Banks goes from a lanky debate dork to a curvaceous bombshell. When she returns to her prestigious private boarding school as a sophomore, she catches the eye of the most popular senior boy, Mathew Livingston. The two start dating and Frankie finds herself engrossed by the easy goofiness of Mathew and his friends. However, Frankie’s latent abilities as a pranking mastermind slowly begin to surface as she grows discontent with the idea of being just Mathew’s girlfriend. She wants to be a part of Mathews friend group—a bond made even more impenetrable by their membership in an all male secret society. In a one-woman effort to subvert the patriarchal foundations of her school, the secret society and her relationship, to find acceptance and acknowledgement from her peers (particularly her male peers), and to shake up the sense of surveillance implicit in her school’s construction, Frankie manages to take covert control over the secret society. Inevitably, these escapades get her into a great deal of trouble… but you’ll have to read it to see exactly why.
E’S 2 CENTS:
Before we begin, a side note: buy this book in hard cover. The paperback cover is heinous. For the record, I am absolutely against photographs of people on book covers. Old photos, artistic photos and photos that show only part of the body (hands for example) are the exceptions—and then only if the picture represents the novel. The girl on the paperback cover of Disreputable History is completely unnecessary. The highly commercial shot of a blond teenager on the paperback cover makes the novel seem trivial and disposable… which it is not. The hardcover is much more representative of the novel’s quality and content.
Ok. Good book. It stands alone as an interesting and intelligent read, but also provides some great opportunities for further reading and research. The panopticon, patriarchal structures, etc are all good things to keep investigating if you’re so inclined. I think my favorite thing about this novel, though, is the exploration of power and gender and how they play out both in personal relationships and in society at large. Lockhart doesn’t necessarily take a final, definitive stance on anything, but she provides an excellent literary environment to explore such issues. When we started discussing this book in class, it became obvious to me that most people were making sweeping generalizations and assumptions about feminism and its definition. The discussion failed to acknowledge that there are many types and forms of feminism—and I think that more than one are at play in this novel. This is a good thing to dig into and discuss. Do it.
A final note: be on the look out for the funky narration. The narrator seems to have a singular identity (he/she uses the pronoun “I”) and engages the reader directly (uses “you”), but is somehow outside the story (he/she is not one of the characters). The narrator’s perspective is limited to knowledge of Frankie’s feelings and experiences and does not extend beyond the time shortly following the main action of the novel. I won’t lie to you, at first this really bothered me. I was highly irritated with being addressed by a mysterious narrator that could identify with me, but whose identity I could not locate. Then… it clicked. You wont get this till you read the book, but I think Lockhart’s writing makes the reader feel the same way Alpha must have felt when receiving disembodied e-mails. In many ways, I think this is Frankie writing her own Disreputable History for future generations.
I’m really tired… let me know if that makes sense after you’ve read the book. Worth a read.
--E